Some of my issues my have a small bit to do with it,
but nothing is as high as is being reported concerning pesticides.
First the Percentages below the merrit parkwat were 25% presence - not above action levels.
Second, when doing calculations, the query for all tests, included a numebr of repeat positive tests.
Why, because i made a mistake:
In gathering all the information that i could on wells, there were times that the presence of a pool was not recorded or a well depth was recorded as what an owner remembered, not what a well drillers report showed. Since the query was a "grouped" query, so that the highest level of pesticide found would show, individual properties were counted twice.
This increased the number of tests significantly.
So in this blog, i am trying to give the most accurate information that i can.
The current number of 30% above action level is being reported and yet even with all my mistakes, it never was that level.
24% presence level and above the action level was less.
so here is what i have, correcting previous mistakes:
total wells tested | 766 |
less early test | 713 (not using current methods and with poor detection levels.) |
Summary of extra information collected
House Built | Well depth | well distance | pool Onsite | |
Average | 1958 | 250 | 33 | |
Max | 2008 | 1100 | 200 | |
Min | 1730 | 30 | 0 | |
count | 741 | 134 | 97 | 55 |
median | 1962 | 200 | 25 |
Sum of pesticides
Chlordane | Dieldren | Heptachlor epoxide | Transnonchlor | alpha chlordane | gamma chlordane | ||
max | 7.400 | 1.300 | 0.240 | 0.100 | 0.930 | 0.740 | |
not 0 | 75 | 108 | 7 | 6 | 19 | 18 | |
above AL | 26 | 54 | - | - | - | - | |
above MCL | 2 | - | 1.000 | - | - | - |
Percentages (Dieldren and chlordane only)
dieldren and chlordane both present? | percent | ||||||
both | 33 | 4.31% | |||||
either | 117 | 16.41% |
both dieldren and chlordane >= AL | percent | ||
18 | 2.35% | ||
44 | 6.17% |
In the meantime i am doing one last study on nitrate levels in the wells found with pesticides and not found a significant correlation
To those reviewing this, know there are probably more mistakes that i have made and i will correct them when i find them
No comments:
Post a Comment